Tuesday, April 15, 2025

“股神不是巴菲特,是美国议员”!川普发文暗示后,亲密女议员精准抄底科技股 | April 7 2025 | Big rebound

 据商业内幕、新闻周刊4月15日综合报道 在华盛顿政治舞台上,有些事情虽然不违法,却看上去格外难看。近日,美国乔治亚州共和党众议员玛乔丽·泰勒·格林(Marjorie Taylor Greene)被质疑进行“内幕交易”——当然,是完全合法的那种。


事情的起点是一条“总统级”推文。川普在宣布对一系列外国商品实施90天关税暂停的几个小时前,突然在社交平台Truth Social上鼓吹:“现在是买入的好时机。”这句话一出,标普500和纳指如闻号角,立刻强势反弹。而就在这个关键时间点前后,Marjorie议员悄悄完成了“多达21笔股票交易”,买入金额在2.1万至31.5万美元之间,涉及苹果、特斯拉、英伟达、帕兰蒂尔等17家企业。

投资神操作?还是“天降灵感”?

根据周一公布的国会议员财务披露文件,这些交易发生在上周二与周三,也就是川普公开表示将暂停关税前后。市场尚处于因贸易摩擦紧张而导致的低迷期,而川普的“宽松声明”直接提振市场情绪。若这些股票在政策公布前购入,短期内的账面收益可谓“精准收割”。

当然,Marjorie本人很快做出回应,表示她并不直接管理自己的投资账户,一切操作都交由独立财务顾问处理。


她强调:“我所有的投资活动都已完全透明披露,符合相关法规。”


问题是,“透明”并不意味着“清白”。目前没有证据证明Marjorie掌握了川普政策的内部信息,但这正是美国政商生态的荒诞之处:你不需要违法,只需知道得早一点、买得快一点,就足以领先整个市场。


“神奇的玛乔丽”与她的2200万美元

根据公开资料,Marjorie在担任国会议员前的净资产约为70万美元,而如今,据估算她的身家已经攀升至2200万美元。在一个年薪17.4万美元的岗位上,这样的财富增长只能用“股神附体”来解释。

如果她真的凭借选股能力实现了30倍财富增长,那她也许该考虑离开国会、去伯克希尔·哈撒韦接班巴菲特。但更可能的真相是——她只是又一个懂得如何玩转“合法腐败”的政客。

Marjorie并不孤单。


在国会,股票交易是一项跨党派的“常规运动”。曾几何时,民主党大佬南希·佩洛西的丈夫保罗·佩洛西,因数次精准操作引发媒体惊呼“应当将其交易记录作为投资教材”。2024年,保罗在司法部宣布对Visa展开反垄断调查之前,悄然抛售50万美元的该公司股票——简直就像是剧本照着写。

所以当民主党众议员亚当·希夫(Adam Schiff)站出来高呼要调查Marjorie时,多少显得有些“表演意味”过浓。要知道,Adam在川普第一次弹劾案中都无法打出有效一击,如今他声称要对华盛顿最根深蒂固的金钱游戏动手,无异于想用水枪扑灭森林大火。

华盛顿的“合法内幕”:不仅仅是贪婪,是结构

我们该明确一点:这不仅仅是Marjorie的问题,更不是川普的问题。这是一整套制度运作的必然结果。

2012年通过的《国会议员内幕交易禁止法案》(STOCK Act)看似是对国会议员的约束,要求其在股票交易后45天内申报。但实际操作中,这项法律没有强制限制议员投资个股,更没有严厉的惩罚机制。

也就是说,哪怕你在投票通过某项利好半导体行业的法案前,悄悄买入了英伟达股票,只要你45天内申报——一切都合法。而在股价早已飞天之后,这份申报只是补上一句:“哦对了,我当时确实买了。”

于是,这就成了美国政坛的一种常态:权力即财富密码,信息即市场武器。

你要反垄断?那你最好别持有亚马逊。你想削减军费?那你手上的雷神和洛马股票怎么办?立法与持股之间的“利益冲突”,在这套体制下并非漏洞,而是默许的盈利方式。

公职?不,是财富通道

也正因为如此,许多政客愿意斥资数百万美元竞选一个年薪不到20万美元的职位。因为他们知道,真正的收益不是薪资,而是:

- 政策制定前的资讯优先权
- 立法过程中的话语权
- 行业游说的资源配置权

换句话说,他们不需要腐败——他们已经在一个制度性允许灰色套利的环境中畅通无阻地运行。

所以我们不该只把Marjorie当成一个“贪婪的政客”,而应看到她是这个游戏中的典型玩家。更讽刺的是,她甚至没有遮掩。她的交易频繁、时间精准、公司选择与市场敏感事件高度吻合,几乎是“明牌下注”。

但真正的问题不在于她是不是“投机倒把”,而在于这个系统是否鼓励、甚至奖励了这样的行为。

最后一句:真正的丑闻是什么?

媒体的目光聚焦在Marjorie的交易,但真正的丑闻是——这一切竟然都合法。

合法到你我都看得见,明明白白写在申报表上。合法到即便全美上下都义愤填膺,国会也能装聋作哑地把真正的改革法案一次次扼杀。

在这样一个“合法即正义”的制度里,不要再期待改革来自内部。你能预期的,只是下一轮“巧合”的交易、下一次“提前”布局的财报,以及下一份“透明但迟到”的披露表。

因为在华盛顿,唯一不能容忍的,不是内幕交易,而是不懂怎么玩这场游戏的人。


the Ministry of Children and Family Development (MCFD) | a child's safety

 In British Columbia, when a child's safety is at risk, the Ministry of Children and Family Development (MCFD) or a delegated Aboriginal agency may investigate and take action to ensure the child's safety, including potentially removing the child from the home. This process is known as child protection. The ministry's role is to safeguard children from abuse, neglect, or other situations that may endanger their well-being. 

Here's a more detailed explanation:
  • Child Protection Services:
    The MCFD, through its child protection social workers, investigates reports of child abuse, neglect, or any other situation where a child's safety is at risk. 
  • Reporting:
    Anyone who has reason to believe a child is in need of protection is legally obligated to report it to the Director of Child Protection or a delegated social worker. 
  • Intervention:
    Depending on the circumstances, the ministry may provide support services to the family, supervise the child's care in the home, or, in serious cases, remove the child from the home and place them with relatives, foster families, or specialized residential resources. 
  • Guiding Principles:
    The MCFD's actions are guided by principles that prioritize the child's safety and best interests, while also respecting the rights and responsibilities of parents and Indigenous communities. 
  • Extended Family Program:
    In cases of removal, the MCFD may consider placing the child with extended family members, as explained by Aboriginal Legal Aid in BC. 
  • Adoption:
    The MCFD also plays a role in finding permanent, loving homes for children in their care who are waiting to be adopted. 
In essence, the MCFD acts as a protector of children in British Columbia, ensuring their safety and well-being when necessary.

NEWS: Sens. Schiff, Gallego Demand Investigation into Potential Insider Trading and Corruption Ahead of Trump Tariff Pause After President Trump previewed his delay of tariffs on Truth Social, Schiff and Gallego raise alarm on potential for self-enrichment by Trump family and White House officials who knew of impending a

 April 10, 2025

NEWS: Sens. Schiff, Gallego Demand Investigation into Potential Insider Trading and Corruption Ahead of Trump Tariff Pause

After President Trump previewed his delay of tariffs on Truth Social, Schiff and Gallego raise alarm on potential for self-enrichment by Trump family and White House officials who knew of impending announcement

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Senator Ruben Gallego (D-Arizona) demanded that the White House provide information about potential violations of federal ethics and insider trading laws prior to President Donald Trump’s announcement yesterday pausing the implementation of steep and widespread tariffs or prior to previous announcements of changes in tariff policy.

The Senators also demanded that the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) investigate potential conflicts of interest, including whether any White House or executive branch officials, to include special government employees, were informed of the announcement in advance and what financial transactions were made by officials with knowledge of non-public information.

“The apparent conflict of interest issues President Trump’s announcement presents regarding Mr. Musk apply to all White House and executive branch employees – including special government employees – who may have had access to non-public information regarding the deliberations and ultimate changes in tariff policy,” the Senators wrote.

The Senators request an accounting of which White House or Trump administration officials were part of the deliberations on the change in policy or announcement, and whether those individuals made stock transactions or communicated with financial proxies ahead of the announcement. The Senators also seek to understand any potential notification the President’s family may have had prior to the change in policy.

The letter cites the social media posts made by President Trump on the morning of the announced change, where followers were encouraged to “BUY” in the hours before the change in tariff policy.

Previously, Senator Schiff led efforts to clarify Elon Musk’s potential conflicts of interest and compliance with federal ethics law in light of his access to sensitive government information. The letter cites continuing concern with his ongoing potential to benefit from insider information, as Tesla stock rose nearly 20% in the hours after the pause.

The full letter text can be found here or below:

Dear Ms. Wiles and Acting Director Greer,

We write to request an urgent inquiry into whether President Trump, his family, or other members of the administration engaged in insider trading or other illegal financial transactions, informed by advanced knowledge of non-public information regarding his changes to tariff policy, yesterday or at any time during this administration. President Trump’s decision to ease most tariffs predictably caused the financial markets to skyrocket after crashing and undergoing wild fluctuations since the President’s April 2, 2025, Executive Order announcing global tariffs.

Since his inauguration, President Trump has repeatedly invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to unilaterally impose substantial new tariffs on imports from nearly every country in the world. Unlike various other trade authorities vested in the executive, tariffs levied under IEEPA are not subject to investigation or affirmative determination from Executive Branch Agencies. On April 2, 2025, again invoking IEEPA unilateral emergency authorities, President Trump announced the broadest across-the-board increase in tariffs since the 1930s.3 The market reactions were immediate and swift. In the four days following the President’s initial declaration of a national emergency and corresponding tariffs, the S&P 500 lost $5.83 trillion in market value. This represents the steepest four days of losses since the index was created. 

On the morning of April 9, 2025, President Trump posted on Truth Social at 9:33 AM: “BE COOL! Everything is going to work out well. The USA will be bigger and better than ever before!” The President subsequently posted at 9:37 AM: “THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!! DJT”.

Mere hours after his post, President Trump announced at 1:18 PM via Truth Social that he would be pausing most of the sweeping tariffs he had announced just days prior, causing stocks to soar. Following this reversal in policy, the markets quickly rebounded and by the close of market on April 9, 2025 at 4:00 PM, the S&P 500 recorded a 9.5 percent single-day gain – the index’s largest gain since 2008.

This sequence of events raises grave legal and ethics concerns. The President, his family, and his advisors are uniquely positioned to be privy to and take advantage of non-public information to inform their investment decisions. For instance, stock in Elon Musk’s company, Tesla, increased 18 percent immediately following the President’s announcement to pause most tariffs, which Mr. Musk had publicly opposed. Senator Schiff previously sent letters to the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) and White House requesting clarification regarding Mr. Musk’s compliance with federal conflicts of interest, ethics, and reporting requirements in light of his activities within the Executive Office of the President and his access to sensitive government information while he retains significant financial interests in multiple private companies that benefit from federal government contracts. Congress has yet to receive a response to these letters.

The apparent conflict of interest issues President Trump’s announcement presents regarding Mr. Musk apply to all White House and executive branch employees – including special government employees – who may have had access to non-public information regarding the deliberations and ultimate changes in tariff policy. Similar concerns apply to members of the President’s family under federal securities laws. Therefore, we ask that OGE use its authority under 5 CFR 2638.108(a) to conduct an immediate review of:

Whether any White House and executive branch agency employees – including special government employees – violated federal ethics laws or regulations, specifically with regard to stock trades or financial transactions preceding the President’s April 9 announcement, or at any other time the President made changes to tariff policy.

Any communications between White House and executive branch agency employees – including special government employees – and external parties, including financial institutions, brokers, dealers, investment advisors, or business associates, that may have included non-public information. Please preserve all relevant records and correspondence.

In pursuing this review, we also request that OGE review and produce any periodic transaction reports filed by any government officials in proximity to the President’s April 9 announcement – or any other changes in tariff policy – and provide a supplemental response to this inquiry at the end of the next required reporting period. Additionally, we request that OGE coordinate with relevant Inspectors General to determine whether any stock trades or financial transactions by White House and executive branch agency employees – including special government employees – or members of the President’s family violated federal ethics or insider trading laws.

Furthermore, we request answers from the White House to the following questions by April 18, 2025:

1. Were any White House and executive branch agency employees – including special government employees – informed of the deliberations and/or change in tariff policy prior to President Trump’s announcement on April 9, 2025?

a. If so, which individuals were involved in any deliberations regarding the change in policy?

b. If so, which individuals were informed prior to the announcement?

c. When were these individuals informed of the change in policy?

d. Via what channels were these decisions communicated to these individuals? Please preserve all relevant records and correspondence.

e. Did the White House consult with OGE prior to briefing these individuals on the anticipated announcement? Please preserve all relevant records and correspondence.

2. Were any members of the President’s family involved in deliberations and/or informed of the change in tariff policy prior to President Trump’s announcement on April 9, 2025?

a. If so, which individuals were informed prior to the announcement?

b. When were these individuals informed of the change in policy?

c. Via what channels were these decisions communicated to these individuals? Please preserve all relevant records and correspondence.

d. Did the White House consult with OGE prior to briefing these individuals on the anticipated announcement? Please preserve all relevant records and correspondence.

3. Were any White House and executive branch agency employees – including special government employees – informed of the deliberations and/or decisions to make changes in tariff policy under this administration?

a. If so, which individuals were involved in any deliberations regarding the change in policy?

b. If so, which individuals were informed prior to the announcement?

c. When were these individuals informed of the change in policy?

d. Via what channels were these decisions communicated to these individuals? Please preserve all relevant records and correspondence.

e. Did the White House consult with OGE prior to briefing these individuals on the anticipated announcement? Please preserve all relevant records and correspondence.

4. Were any members of the President’s family involved in deliberations and/or informed of decisions to make changes in tariff policy under this administration?

a. If so, which individuals were informed prior to the announcement?

b. When were these individuals informed of the change in policy?

c. Via what channels were these decisions communicated to these individuals? Please preserve all relevant records and correspondence.

d. Did the White House consult with OGE prior to briefing these individuals on the anticipated announcement? Please preserve all relevant records and correspondence.

5. What steps were taken, if any, to prevent misuse of non-public information by White House and executive branch agency employees – including special government employees? Please preserve all relevant records and correspondence.

6. What steps were taken, if any, to prevent misuse of non-public information by members of the President’s family? Please preserve all relevant records and correspondence.

We look forward to reviewing your responses on this important matter. 

Marjorie Taylor Greene’s well-timed stock purchases draw scrutiny

Marjorie Taylor Greene’s well-timed stock purchases draw scrutiny

Before pausing much of his tariffs agenda, Donald Trump wrote online, “THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!!” Marjorie Taylor Greene apparently took the advice.

By  

Last week, Donald Trump surprised much of the world with a 90-day “pause” to much of his agenda on trade tariffs. The major Wall Street indexes had been falling off a cliff in response to the president’s trade agenda, but investors were delighted to see the Republican back off, and markets immediately soared.

It wasn’t long, however, before many observers started to take note of the timing. A few hours before he made the announcement, the president — who had publicly insisted that his trade tariffs were “here to stay” and would “never change” — published a related item to his social media platform. “THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!!” he wrote. It came four minutes after Trump also wrote, “BE COOL! Everything is going to work out well.”

Evidently, one of Trump’s closest allies on Capitol Hill also thought it was a good time to buy. The New York Times reported:

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, disclosed on Monday that she had purchased between tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of stock on April 8 and 9, the day before and the day of President Trump’s announcement that he was pausing a sweeping set of global tariffs, a pivot that sent the stock market soaring out of a sizable slump. Ms. Greene bought between about $21,000 and $315,000 in stocks on those days. The day before Mr. Trump’s move, she also dumped between $50,000 and $100,0000 in Treasury bills, according to required public disclosures made to the House.

These disclosure documents are public information, which have been published online. In this instance, they show the right-wing congresswoman made nearly two dozen trades — ranging from $1,001 to $15,000 — the day before and the day of her presidential ally’s “pause” announcement.

When the Times sought comment from the Georgia Republican — who chairs a DOGE panel on the House Oversight Committee — she declined.

Shortly after the news broke, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries sat down with MSNBC’s Jen Psaki, who sought his reaction to the developments.

“So many of these people are crooks, liars and frauds, and Marjorie Taylor Greene is, of course, Exhibit A,” the New York Democrat said. “We are seeing corruption unfold before us in real time. And House Democrats and Senate Democrats are going to partner together to make sure we, of course, shine a spotlight on these issues. One, we do need to change the law so that sitting members of Congress cannot trade stock. Period. Full stop. And until we get to that point, we obviously have to continue to highlight why this is problematic.”

Jeffries is hardly alone on this. Around the time he was on MSNBC, one of his fellow House Democrats, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a longtime critic of lawmakers being able to make stock trades, delivered remarks to a sizable crowd in Idaho, where she addressed the Times’ report.

“We saw Majorie Taylor Greene buy that dip,” the New York Democrat said. “How much did you make? How much did you make off of people’s despair? How much did you make off of that panic? How much did you make off of that suffering? No more. We can’t accept it.”

In the other chamber, meanwhile, the morning after Trump’s move, Democratic Sens. Adam Schiff of California and Ruben Gallego of Arizona wrote to the Office of Government Ethics demanding an investigation into possible market manipulation. A day later, an even larger group of Senate Democrats appealed to the Securities and Exchange Commission, calling on the agency to launch an investigation into “potential violations of federal securities laws by President Trump and his affiliates.”

I don’t imagine we’ve heard the last of this. Watch this space.

https://www.quiverquant.com/congresstrading/politician/Marjorie%20Taylor%20Greene-G000596



Monday, April 14, 2025

AL programming | Business central

 


Welcome to the AL Language extension for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central.

 

Overview

Welcome to the AL Language extension for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central.

Note: To deploy code built using this extension you must sign up for a Dynamics 365 Business Central Sandbox tenant

With this extension, you can write extensions for Dynamics 365 Business Central in the AL language with full support for formatting, syntax highlighting, and rich IntelliSense.

This extension includes:

  • Editing support through IntelliSense (Ctrl+Space), syntax highlighting, and formatting
  • Typing AL:Go! in the command palette (Ctrl+Shift+P) easily gets you started with your first AL extension
  • Support for and snippets to define Codeunits, Control Addins, Pages, Page Customizations, Page Extensions, Profiles, Queries, Reports, Tables, Table Extensions, and XmlPorts
  • Support for find all references (Shift+F12) to list all instances of a specific symbol
  • Incremental compilation with diagnostics appearing in the Problems window while working
  • Added native support for using HTTP and JSON types to access Azure functions and other web services
  • Using Ctrl+F5 to deploy to the current development instance and using F5 to deploy and debug
  • Ability to define a dependency on another extension by listing it in the app.json configuration file
  • Autogeneration of app.json and launch.json project files
  • Using Ctrl+Alt+F5 to perform rapid application development(RAD) and using Alt+F5 to perform RAD and debugging

Note: The AL Language extension for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and the AL compiler ship with English (en-US) as the display language. The display language is used for the display text for the commands contributed by the extension as well as for all diagnostic messages emitted by the compiler.

Documentation

Read more about developing in AL in our documentation here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/business-central/dev-itpro.

Support

If you encounter bugs with the extension, ensure you have the latest version of Visual Studio Code before reporting them through GitHub https://github.com/microsoft/al/issues.

License and Privacy

The extension is made available under the Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central License Terms for your use with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central or Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central On-Premises. Your use of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central or Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central On-Premises is subject to the license/use rights provided to you by Microsoft, and the following Microsoft Enterprise and Developer Privacy Statement.

Telemetry

The AL Language extension for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central collects telemetry data, which is used to help understand how to improve the product. For example, this data helps to debug issues, such as compiler crashes, slow compilation times, and to prioritize new features.

The extension respects the Visual Studio Code setting for telemetry reporting. While we appreciate the insights this data provides, we also know that not everyone wants to send usage data and you can disable telemetry as described in disable telemetry reporting.