From January 2015, she started to practice leetcode questions; she trains herself to stay focus, develops "muscle" memory when she practices those questions one by one. 2015年初, Julia开始参与做Leetcode, 开通自己第一个博客. 刷Leet code的题目, 她看了很多的代码, 每个人那学一点, 也开通Github, 发表自己的代码, 尝试写自己的一些体会. She learns from her favorite sports – tennis, 10,000 serves practice builds up good memory for a great serve. Just keep going. Hard work beats talent when talent fails to work hard.
Monday, September 8, 2025
SABRE | Morningstar | 2025 Sept
Sabre: After Review, We Reduce Our Fair Value Estimate to $3 Analyst Note Dan Wasiolek, Senior Equity Analyst, 11 Aug 2025 We have ended Sabre's under review status after assessing second-quarter results and updating our forecast. Why it matters: Sabre severely cut its guidance for second-half air booking growth to 4%-10% from 20%. The firm gave equal weight to weaker industry demand, its higher US government, corporate, and regional mix, and the timing of an IT project, all of which should be transitory headwinds. g We have reduced our 2025 pro forma sales growth estimate to 2% from 6%, driven by expected air booking growth of 2% versus our prior 10% forecast. Beyond this year, we still see 2.5% average air booking growth during 2026-34, including 6% in 2026 as current headwinds subside. The bottom line: We have decreased our fair value estimate for narrow-moat Sabre to $3 per share from $4.87. While the shares appear undervalued, price action could remain volatile, given the precarious environment for business and corporate travel. We maintain our Very High Uncertainty Rating. g About 80% of our fair value estimate reduction is driven by the lower air booking forecast this year, with most of the remainder due to our decreased 2025 non-air booking (mostly accommodations) growth forecast reduction to 0.8% from 7%. Amid ominous demand, investor concerns about the company's liquidity profile remain elevated. But with demand stabilization in 2026, we think Sabre can produce $400 million in free cash flow to the firm and $700 million in cash next year, which would allow it to service its debt obligations
Business Strategy & Outlook Dan Wasiolek, Senior Equity Analyst, 11 Aug 2025 Despite near-term economic growth concerns caused by tariff uncertainty, which is negatively affecting its corporate and government business, we expect Sabre to reduce net debt/adjusted EBITDA to 6 times by the end of 2025 from 8.5 times in 2024, using proceeds from the prudent sale of its hospitality solutions business. We maintain our stance that Sabre will hold its position in global distribution systems, or GDS, over the next 10 years. This view is driven by a gradual recovery in corporate travel and Sabre's leading network of airline content and travel agency customers, as well as its solid position in technology solutions for these carriers and agents. Sabre's 30%-plus GDS air transaction share is the second largest of the three companies (behind narrow-moat Amadeus and ahead of privately held Travelport) that together control about 100% of market volume. Sabre's GDS enjoys a network advantage, which is the source of its narrow moat rating. As more supplier content (predominantly airline content) is added, more travel agents use the platform, and as more travel agents use the platform, suppliers offer more content. This network advantage is solidified by technology that integrates GDS content with back-office operations of agents and IT solutions of suppliers, which would require significant costs and time to replicate, and leads to more accurate information that is also easier to book. The firm's network prowess should be supported by its technology partnership with wide-moat Alphabet and its transition to the cloud, both of which we see driving innovation and cost efficiencies. The company's next-generation platform, SabreMosaic, is an open-source cloud-based artificial intelligence solution that makes it easier for airlines to customize its offering and upsell content. The company's GDS faces some risk of larger carriers making direct connections with larger agencies, although we expect these relationships to be the exception rather than the rule and expect Sabre to still be the aggregating platform in either case. Bulls Say Dan Wasiolek, Senior Equity Analyst, 11 Aug 2025 u The company's GDS network hosts content from all airlines and is used by many travel agents, resulting in a large industry share. Replicating this would involve meaningful time and costs. u The network advantage is supported by Sabre's platform revitalization with next-generation cloud and AI technology, which drives innovation, reliability, and cost efficiencies. u The business model is predominantly driven by transaction volume and not pricing, leading to less cyclical volatility. Bears Say Dan Wasiolek, Senior Equity Analyst, 11 Aug 2025 u Slowing economic growth presents a headwind to near-term demand for business and leisure travel booked on Sabre's network.
Business Description
Sabre holds the number-two air booking volume share in the global distribution system industry. The travel solutions segment represented 91% of total 2024 revenue, split between distribution (79% of segment sales) and airline IT solutions (21%) revenue. The company announced a planned sale of its growing hotel IT solutions division (9% of revenue) to TPG for $960 million in net proceeds, which is scheduled to close in late 2025. Transaction fees, which are mostly tied to volume and not price, account for the bulk of sales and profits.
Long-term incentive costs could increase for Sabre's network business, as online travel agents represent an increasing mix of GDS bookings, and they are lower-margin for the company. u Sabre is exposed to corporate travel, where volume could be hampered by some enduring use of video conferencing displacing internal and other meetings. Economic Moat Dan Wasiolek, Senior Equity Analyst, 11 Aug 2025 We think Sabre will uphold its network, switching cost, and efficient scale prowess, driven by challenges in replicating its aggregation, cost, and customer data position, and the value offered to its suppliers, agents, and travelers. We see these advantages remaining in place despite risks from artificial intelligence, direct connect competition, structurallylower corporate travel, and the ability to reinvest in an environment of elevated rates. As a result, we rate Sabre as having a narrow moat, reflecting our confidence in its ability to earn economic profits over the next 10 years, with estimated
returns on invested capital including goodwill averaging 16% over 2025-34 versus our 8.2% estimate of its weighted average cost of capital. Sabre’s distribution segment (72% of 2024 revenue) holds a network advantage, as it aggregates the content of hundreds of carriers and efficiently integrates that with travel agent back-office operations, which requires significant time and cost to build and operate. In addition to the several hundred global airlines, there are tens of thousands of traditional travel agents in the United States alone and many online travel agents and travel management companies, which are integrated onto Sabre’s travel network. Convincing these businesses to implement a new system would take significant time and result in high costs for all parties. In addition to hurdles replicating Sabre’s aggregation, the cost and value of its network are hard to mimic. Sabre’s platform costs airline operators just a low-single-digit percentage of their total ticket, which is comparable to the cost of a direct booking occurring on a carrier website after assuming marketing costs. Thus, it would be hard for a new competitor to beat. This low cost comes despite the platform’s global reach of travelers that can represent up to half of an airline operator’s total bookings. Low-cost carriers initially derived all their bookings from direct channels, but as the routes of these airlines expanded globally over the past several years, they have increasingly turned to Sabre’s distribution channel to reach a global corporate traveler. Given its value proposition, we don’t believe airlines will steer from using Sabre’s network, a view supported by American Airlines' loss of revenue share when it temporarily deemphasized the GDS channel in 2024. We also don’t expect carriers to incrementally push their own direct channels over the next several years, as the industry’s New Distribution Capability protocol increasingly allows Sabre’s platform to offer suppliers the ability to showcase customized content in a user-friendly fashion. Travel agents and travelers also benefit from Sabre’s network. First, Sabre offers the world’s airline content on one platform for agencies to use versus having to do multiple searches across individual carrier websites or call centers. Further, agents also benefit from having Sabre’s platform integrated into their back-office systems, which makes for a more efficient process and allows for technology updates as innovation improves. Finally, we estimate agents already get a 50%-75% cut of an airline booking fee paid to them for using Sabre’s or Amadeus’ platform, which also strikes us as a high mark for others to surpass. In total, the value of Sabre’s distribution network is illustrated in the company’s share of air booking volume increasing in each of the last eight quarters through 2024. Many of the drivers underlying network advantages for Sabre’s core distribution business also foster an efficient scale moat, in our view. To begin, efficient scale is witnessed by Sabre, Amadeus, and Travelport controlling essentially 100% of the market. The efficient scale advantage is also evident by Sabre’s travel network scale, allowing it to offer global distribution to airlines at costs that are typically only a low-single-digit percentage of the total airline ticket (similar to expenses incurred for airlines
through their own direct website bookings), which we believe would be timely and costly to replicate and improve upon, buoyed by the fact that large online operating companies like wide-moat Booking and narrow-moat Expedia continue to source airline content from Sabre and its peers versus building it out themselves. While Sabre’s distribution network holds network and efficient scale advantages, its airline IT solutions business provides a third switching cost advantage, which makes it costly and time-consuming for carriers to move to another provider. This is illustrated by IT solution contract lengths of three to seven years, implementation times of one to two years with high costs, and renewal rates for Sabre that are comfortably above 90% (Amadeus has noted similar renewal rates). Given the consistently high renewal rates and length of contracts, it would be several years before the competitive advantages of this business materially waned. And in our view, Sabre’s network, switching cost, and efficient scale advantages are fortified by the company’s recent investment in revitalizing its travel network by migrating functionality to the cloud and streamlining its technology offering, which should allow for improved product innovation at lower costs long term. We think Sabre will continue to invest in its competitive advantages. We don’t think Sabre’s competitive positioning will be materially altered by the risk of AI large language models displacing its platform, due to its vast customer database and partnership with Google’s AI and cloud infrastructure. OpenAI and Gemini will increasingly have the capability to quicklyreturn relevant travel content information to a user. However, we think the content these generative AI products draw upon will be owned by either the direct supplier or aggregated platforms like Sabre, which has accumulated billions of annual customer travel data points over the last few decades; we see this as essential to unlocking the promise of more customized offerings and generating bookings in an AI world. That said, we acknowledge the risk that over time, AI personal assistant recommendations become refined to endorse just one choice, potentially directing more of those bookings directly to a carrier’s website versus through options on an OTA. Still, OTAs have historically offered users a better experience (superior pictures, descriptions, check out) than suppliers, which could ensure the strong loyalty and direct traffic the large platforms have enjoyed endures. Sabre has also been building out its own AI product capabilities the last few years. In fact, in 2020, Sabre signed a 10-year partnership with Google to develop customized product offerings that leverage its travel expertise with Google’s cloud and AI/LLM capabilities. To do this, Sabre first had to migrate its 17 on-premises data centers to the cloud during 2018-23, which has allowed for lower costs and faster product innovation with the aid of Google’s machine learning. For example, Sabre has integrated Google’s AI/LLM with its customer data set to help agencies offer its travel users more customized hotel and airline content through its global distribution system platform. Also, Sabre is using AI to leverage data on its agents to help them become more productive. Additionally, Sabre is embedding AI in technology solutions used directly by its airline and hotel customers, which accounts for about 30% of
the company’s total revenue. For instance, Google and Sabre announced a next-generation airline IT platform, SabreMosaic, in May 2024. We think this open-source cloud-based artificial intelligence network will improve the ability of airlines to offer customized and ancillary content, helping drive revenue for both the carrier and Sabre, thereby supporting the company’s platform edge in a world that increasingly uses machine learning. In our view, Sabre’s AI/cloud partnership with Google is just one of many signals that the search giant is not planning to compete directly with the travel network. Although Google has the financial means to replicate global distribution system networks, we think the challenges of reproducing Sabre's platform are shown in the lack of movement the search giant has taken in competing against these platforms. Acquired in 2011, Google’s ITA software is an algorithm used by some online channels like Google Flights and Kayak. That said, these channels still use GDS platforms to connect to airline inventory and pricing. We don’t think Google will look to leverage its ITA asset into a competing GDS for several reasons. To begin, we believe Google faces challenges in getting traditional travel agents and travel management companies to switch from Amadeus and Sabre, as it would require time and cost, and because it would also need to offer similar airline content. Also, Google would likely have trouble convincing online travel companies to use its platform to source airline content versus Sabre, given that the search giant poses a larger competitive threat than Sabre to these operators. Additionally, Google’s DNA has historically not been tied to being a merchant but rather allowing information to flow as efficiently as possible, an approach we don’t see changing, especially as anticompetitive regulation continues to act as a governor toward any such action. Further, we have not found evidence that Google is investing in the industry’s New Distribution Capability protocol, which is gradually being adopted by suppliers and agents, placing the search leader even further behind Sabre if it chooses to develop a GDS. Finally, Google laid off personnel in its flights division in 2023, which offers another sign that the search engine giant doesn’t appear to have plans to compete directly with GDS operators. We also don’t envision financial strain or structurally lower corporate travel to impede Sabre’s ability to generate economic profits over the next 10 years. In fact, we think Sabre has bolstered its liquidity enough to continue investing in its global distribution system platform and IT solutions for airlines to support its narrow moat rating. To this point, heading into 2022, Sabre had $3.8 billion in debt scheduled to mature in 2024-25, but it now has no major debt maturing until 2027 after successful tender offers and refinancing. We believe Sabre's cash levels ($426 million as of June 30, 2025), free cash flow to the firm of more than $1.4 billion (helped by the sale of its hospitality solutions business for net proceeds of $960 million in 2025), and gradual recovery in platform demand position the companyto service its maturing debt. We have accounted for the potential risk of lower long-term business travel demand as videoconferencing displaces some business travel. Here, we expect air volume on Sabre's GDS platform will recover to around the low 70s of 2019's level by the end of this decade. Then, our average total air
booking industry forecast for 2031-34 of 2% growth is derived from leisure air booking volumes growing by midsingle digits and corporate travel remaining flat. This compares with the 2.8% average growth rate for corporate air travel during 2011-19, according to Euromonitor. Under this assumption, our estimate of Sabre’s ROIC including goodwill is 14%-16% over 2031-34, above our 8.2% estimate of its WACC. Fair Value and Profit Drivers Dan Wasiolek, Senior Equity Analyst, 11 Aug 2025 After reviewing second-quarter results, we have lowered our fair value estimate to $3 per share from $4.87 due to weaker expected sales growth in 2025. Our fair value estimate implies a 2026 enterprise value/EBITDA multiple of 9 times. Sabre's sales fell 1%, missing guidance of low-single-digit growth, driven by a 1% drop in air volume versus our 2% growth estimate, as tariff uncertainty hindered industry demand. The firm decreased its 2025 sales outlook to low-single-digit from high-single-digit growth. It severely cut second-half air booking growth to 4%-10% from 20%. Sabre said weaker industry demand, its higher US government, corporate, and regional mix, and the timing of an IT product implementation equally drove the reduction. These headwinds should be transitory. Weaker demand in the industry and Sabre's business mix are expected to be a 9-percentage-point headwind to air booking growth in the second half. These challenges should be transitory and stabilize with improved tariff visibility, making our 2026 6% air booking growth forecast achievable. Recent business wins are expected to drive about 16 percentage points of air booking growth in the second half. In our view, the customer wins speak to Sabre’s enhanced technology platform. The company has completed its multiyear transformation to the cloud, which has lowered costs to the tune of $150 million, and innovated products, such as its new opensource retail platforms like SabreMosiac, that we think can drive incremental ancillary revenue for the company. Still, this would not be enough to meet our prerelease 10% growth forecast or the firm's prior double-digit growth target in 2025. We have reduced our 2025 estimate to about 2% growth. In Sabre's travel solutions business, we forecast 2% and 9% average annual 2025-34 revenue growth for the distribution and IT solutions segments, respectively. For the distribution business, our forward 10- year network sales forecast is derived from revenue per booking that reaches $5.65 in 2034 from $4.82 in the prepandemic year of 2019, aided by an enduring mix of more cross-border travel. Our 2025-34 IT solutions (IT for airlines) sales forecast is derived from airline revenue per passenger boarded of $1.25 in 2034 compared with $1.34 in 2019. We see the completion of incremental investments, cost-reduction initiatives, and still-recovering global distribution system travel demand lifting profits. Our 2025 operating margin is 13.3%, up from 1.6% in 2023. As a result of our top-line and cost forecasts, we expect operating margin to average a low-double-digit percentage during the next 10 years from 9.1% in the prepandemic year of 2019 (heavy
investment period). Risk and Uncertainty Dan Wasiolek, Senior Equity Analyst, 11 Aug 2025 Our Morningstar Uncertainty Rating for Sabre is Very High. The travel industry is cyclical. A prolonged economic contraction could cause an increasing number of small-business traditional travel agencies to shut down, which could marginally affect long-term transaction volume done on Sabre’s travel network. In the near term, tariff policy uncertainty could reduce travel demand on Sabre's platform. Long term, an increasing portion of business travel following covid-19 could be replaced by video meetings, which would affect the global distribution system industry. Such disruptions could lead to the potential need for incremental liquidity, which could occur at value-destructive levels. Airlines continue to look for ways to migrate bookings directly to their websites, although costs are often similar to those found on indirect distribution platforms like Sabre’s global distribution system, which also increasingly allow for more control of the customer relationship. Technological advances could make it increasingly easy for end users to access not only GDS content but supply from smaller competitive offerings. Still, these threats currently lack the ownership of data, processing, and aggregation capabilities that GDS operators offer. Sabre faces environmental, social, and governance risks around innovation tax code changes, data breaches, potential fees should its platform be viewed as anticompetitive, and obtaining and retaining engineering talent. Capital Allocation Dan Wasiolek, Senior Equity Analyst, 11 Aug 2025 We assign Sabre a Morningstar Capital Allocation Rating of Standard, as its weak balance sheet is offset by our fair view on its investment strategy and shareholder distribution. Sabre's financial health profile is weak. The company ended 2024 with $4.3 billion in net debt, representing about 80% of its enterprise value (based on our $3 fair value estimate). We forecast Sabre’s 2025 debt/adjusted EBITDA at 6.0 times. However, it is encouraging that Sabre doesn’t have any material debt maturing until 2027 ($1.1 billion). We see Sabre’s investment strategy as fair. We see the company’s cloud investment as prudent and benefiting its ability to develop innovative products that will further entrench it with customers. We are also in agreement with the company’s focus on harmonizing its platform to the industry’s New Distribution Capability protocol, as that should help maintain its network and efficient scale advantages over at least the next 10 years, in ourview. We have confidence that management will be able to execute on its investment strategy. We believe CEO Kurt Ekert and other executives have the experience to lead Sabre through an increasingly complex technological landscape. Ekert was brought on as
Boeing Stock Rises. This Cautious Analyst Says It’s Time To Buy.
Boeing stock rose after catching an upgrade from a historically cautious analyst. Investors should take note.
Monday, Vertical Research Partners analyst Rob Stallard upgraded shares of Boeing to Buy from Hold. His price target went to $270 from $242.
It’s “the end of the beginning,” wrote Stallard. Aerospace demand is in good shape, Boeing’s supply-chain problems are abating, and the company’s defense business is stabilizing after a period of losses on fixed-priced contracts following Covid-induced inflation.
The culture is improving, too. “While it’s more intangible than the actual businesses, we also think that Boeing has made good progress tackling its corporate culture,” added Stallard. “Under CEO Kelly Ortberg, we have seen a far less arrogant tone…This improvement has also been noted by customers and suppliers, with a number now commenting that they have much more faith in Boeing actually delivering on its projections.”
Boeing stock was up 1.1% at $232.20 in premarket trading, while S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average futures were up 0.2%.
It has been a long road back for Boeing, which hasn’t reported a full-year profit since 2018, the year before the second tragic 737 MAX crash that was tied back to faulty flight control software.
Wall Street doesn’t expect a profit in 2025, but sees profits returning in 2026. Stallard, who downgraded Boeing stock back in 2020, expects a per-share loss of $2.36 for 2025 and earnings per share of $2.86 for 2026, jumping to $6.20 a share in 2027.
There is no mystery to what will grow earnings at Boeing. It’s plane deliveries. Boeing is expected to deliver about 580 planes in 2025. Stallard expects about 680 in 2026 and 760 in 2027.
Overall, 81% of analysts covering Boeing stock now rate shares Buy, according to FactSet. The average Buy-rating ratio for stocks in the S&P 5oo is about 55%. The average analyst price target is about $260 a share.
Coming into Monday trading, Boeing’s stock was up 30% this year. Investors have been encouraged by the company’s progress in improving quality and production rates.
Write to Al Root at allen.root@dowjones.com
Sunday, September 7, 2025
Stop Gambling, Start Trading: Lessons from The Big Trade
Here is the link.
The big trade
Peter PHAM
牛市和熊市里的心态差:为什么牛市更危险?
Here is the article on X.
牛市和熊市里的心态差:为什么牛市更危险?
今天写一写自己一直想聊的一个话题:牛市和熊市的心态差别。大多数人觉得熊市才是最难熬的阶段,账户缩水,资金被套,心态差点崩溃,但在我自己的交易经验里,真正危险的,其实是牛市(仅仅只是分享个人观点)
很多人不太能理解,为什么赚钱的牛市会比亏钱的熊市更危险?牛市里的赚钱效应会麻痹你的神经,让你失去对风险的敬畏。反而熊市,因为到处都是风险信号,交易员不得不谨慎行事,反而能减少很多致命的错误。
我前面那篇,没有降息的牛市才是最危险的文章,降息牛市我们还能理解为流动性推动,是资金面宽松带来的上涨。但如果没有降息,那就是预期和情绪在推动行情。这种时候,赚钱太容易,交易员心态上就会变得松懈。久而久之,你以为自己比市场聪明,其实只是行情在抬轿子。等到趋势突然反转,往往来不及反应。
07年的牛市,几乎是全民参与的狂欢,大盘从2000点涨到6000点,排队开户的人挤满银行大厅,出租车司机、理发师都在聊股票,大家都觉得买什么都能赚钱。
结果大家都知道了,6000点之后就是漫长的阴跌和套牢。那次让我体会到一个道理:牛市里最危险的不是风险本身,而是大家都不愿意承认风险存在。所有人都在赚钱的环境下,你很难保持冷静,甚至会怀疑自己是不是太保守。等到泡沫破灭,才发现当时的谨慎其实才是正确的。
再比如2015年的杠杆牛,市场的关键词就是两融余额。当时融资融券余额一路飙升,很多人甚至去借钱炒股。那个时候的氛围更疯狂,几乎全民都在讨论炒股秘籍,很多本来和股市完全不搭界的人也蜂拥而入。那时候我身边的一个朋友,连理发的时候都在和理发师讨论哪只股票会涨停,你要是说风险,他反而会笑你胆小。
结果当杠杆资金潮水退去,崩盘的速度快得超乎想象,几天之内就让人亏光本金。那一刻,所有之前的兴奋都变成了恐惧。真正让人受伤的,不是熊市里的亏损,而是牛市里失去理智之后的重仓和加杠杆。
到了2020年,美股疫情后的大牛市,同样有这样的影子。当时各大科技股一路创新高,散户在Robinhood上拼命买入,期权市场每天都有大量的短期期权被买爆。
那时大家都觉得自己是投资天才,动不动就把一周翻倍当成常态。可是真正的巴菲特和一些老牌机构,却在悄悄减仓。市场疯狂的时候,最冷静的人往往是赚得最多的人。
牛市里的赚钱效应,像麻醉药一样,你会觉得止损没必要,觉得仓位轻了是亏。慢慢地,规则和纪律被抛到脑后,剩下的只有不断加码的贪婪。可市场从来不会因为你一时的好运,就改变它的逻辑。牛市的背后,其实陷阱埋得可深了。
反过来,熊市看似让人心态崩溃,但其实对交易员来说,反而是一种保护。
为什么这么说?因为熊市里,你根本不敢掉以轻心。账户缩水会让人自然学会轻仓,市场的阴跌会逼着你设好止损,熊市的环境本身就是高压线,恐惧感让人不敢乱动。
我自己在熊市的时候,反而更容易保持理性。因为行情不好,你很清楚一旦冲动交易就会亏得更惨。所以我会更严格执行规则:单笔不超过2%风险,连续亏损就停手,很多时候,熊市里我干脆减少交易,把精力放在复盘和学习上,这样反而保护了自己。
我身边也有不少朋友,牛市里天天交易,熊市却直接退出市场。虽然看上去是认输,但从结果来看,他们反而避开了很多陷阱,熊市最坏的结果,是少赚甚至小亏,但牛市最坏的结果,却可能是重仓爆仓。
我在交易里最大的感受就是:熊市你自然会谨慎,但牛市的时候,你必须逼自己谨慎。
比如我给自己设定的规则:
单笔风险不超过2%,不管行情多强烈,仓位绝不超标。
连亏两单立即停手,哪怕行情看起来还在往上走。
每天最多三次交易,盈利达到目标后必须停单,不许再贪。
这些规则,在熊市里执行起来很容易,因为行情本来就糟糕,你不想多做。但在牛市里执行却很难,因为机会太多,赚钱太容易,你总是想多抓一点,怕错过行情。可我发现,只要我守住这些规则,长期下来不仅回撤小,而且心态能更稳定。
尤其是最近几年,我越来越坚信:牛市里的纪律,才是能让我活下去的关键。因为牛市让人膨胀,让人觉得市场永远不会错。但市场最爱做的事情,就是打脸。
回头看07年、15年和20年,每一次大规模受伤的,其实都是牛市。牛市让人放松警惕,甚至把风险当笑话,最终导致爆仓清零。熊市虽然痛苦,但反而让人保持理智。
所以我一直提醒自己:牛市的时候,要像熊市一样谨慎;熊市的时候,要像牛市一样有耐心。
市场永远在考验人性。真正能长期生存下来的,不是每次都能抓住牛市的人,而是能在牛市里保持冷静、在熊市里保持信念的人。
这就是我为什么觉得,牛市才是最危险的原因。
Friday, September 5, 2025
Moby Tick Prints - version 1.0.0 | 2025-09-25 | WMT | GOOGL | TSLA | NVDA
Here is the link.
SAMPLE DATA INCLUDED:
Pre-loaded with institutional activity data across popular tickers, updated daily to demonstrate how dark pool activity correlates with future price movements.
The script initially covers these tickers going back 6 months showing the top 10 trades by volume over 400,000 shares: AAPL, AMD, AMZN, ARKK, ARKW, BAC, BITO, COIN, COST, DIA, ETHA, GLD, GOOGL, HD, HYG, IBB, IWM, JNJ, JPM, LQD, MA, META, MSFT, NVDA, PG, QQQ, RIOT, SLV, SMCI, SMH, SOXX, SPY, TLT, TSLA, UNH, USO, V, VEA, VNQ, VOO, VTI, VWO, WMT, XLE, XLF, XLK, XLU, XLV, XLY







































































